- Home
- News
- Commentary
- Defense
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- Environment
- Exclusives
- Fox News
- Foreign Affairs
- Gun Control
- Headlines
- Healthcare
- Homeland Security
- Interviews
- LGBT Issues
- Op-Ed
- Open Letter
- Panel Discussions
- Politics
- Racial Issues
- Religion
- States Issues
- Taxes
- The Courts
- The Tea Party
- The War on Drugs
- Veterans Issues
- Women’s Issues
- History
- Inspirational
- Quotes
- RIght-Wing Myths
- Speeches
- Videos
- Music Videos
- Contact


You people recognize, that this is part of the prologue to “Bowling for Columbine” by Michael Moore? #justsayin’
OK, Alpi – and your point is?
The point is giving credit where credit is due.
Michael Moore is a very controversial director for ignoring or not knowing a ridiculously large proportion of facts and perspectives. He pressures his interviewees UNFAIRLY into giving an answer that benefits him. He is not taken serious any more by a majority of people with expertise in what he covers over the entire political spectrum and possible upbringing and cultures.
At the time, Bowling for Columbine had an overwhelming amount of positive reviews. But, as he released more movies it became more obvious that he had something going wrong psychologically and that his motivations were not as great as people purported. Bowling for Columbine is now looked at much more controversially than it originally was. Before anyone says something about me being Republican or not thinking gun control is good neither of those is true. I believe in gun control.
If this is from Bowling for Columbine though it is full of obvious subjective bias and a neglect of facts. Michael Moore is not a reliable source for anything.