The Washington Post Tears Into Trump For His ‘Constant Exaggerations And Falsehoods’

Trump syria address.png
By The White House – The White House – Youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sVp3yFNEYQ), Public Domain, Link

The Washington Post shredded Trump this week, detailing his many diplomatic failures in the wake of Trump’s botched effort to rework NAFTA. 

Trump started out the week falsely announcing a new trade deal with Mexico and ended the week derailing ongoing talks with Canada in the wake of a report by The Toronto Star, detailing his “off the record” remarks about our neighbor to the north.



According to The Toronto Star:

Trump made his controversial statements in an Oval Office interview with Bloomberg News on Thursday. He said, “off the record,” that he is not making any compromises at all with Canada — and that he could not say this publicly because “it’s going to be so insulting they’re not going to be able to make a deal.”

Trump took to Twitter confirming his remarks once the story broke:

The Washington Post published a lengthy analysis of Trump’s announcement regarding Mexico, beginning with a list of his “diplomatic exaggerations and falsehoods.” (For clarity, we have formatted their list as bullet points.)

  • Trump ended the nuclear threat from North Korea. Except he didn’t.
  • President Trump went to Brussels and extracted big concessions from NATO allies. Except there’s no actual evidence of that.
  • President Trump hailed a “breakthrough agreement” with the European Commission to avert a trade war. Except it was basically just an agreement to talk, with no concrete policy shifts.
  • And now we can add one more to the list. Trump took to the Oval Office on Monday morning to hail “maybe the largest trade deal ever made,” with Mexico — a deal that allowed him to “terminate” the North American Free Trade Agreement, as he’s longed to do. Except neither of these things are even close to being substantiated. And it’s patently obvious that Trump has yet again claimed a major diplomatic victory that is completely premature at best and completely fictional and fanciful at worst.



After a detailed analysis, explaining the falsehood of Trump’s claim to a new deal, The Washington Post concluded their article reporting:

Were Canada to decline to join a new trade deal to replace NAFTA, Trump would almost definitely need to receive congressional authorization for a new, bilateral trade deal — which would be a hard sell given that even Republican lawmakers are wary of Trump’s protectionist approach to trade.

But that’s not the path laid out Tuesday by Trump and the White House. They suggested this can be done via presidential authority even without Canada. Trump appears to be bluffing in hopes of getting Canada on board rather quickly, but it’s also abundantly clear that he’s bluffing.

Canada must know that, and if it understands its choice as being between joining the deal and keeping NAFTA — given that Trump probably can’t replace it with a bilateral deal — it may just decide it’s best to call Trump’s bluff and let him try that. At the very least, it would seem better to wait a little while and not negotiate with a knife at your throat.

All of it might shake out in the end. Canada could indeed join at some point, Trump’s antics notwithstanding. But the path laid out by Trump doesn’t appear to be a viable one, and like his previous, self-proclaimed diplomatic coups, it falls apart almost instantly upon further inspection.

(Visited 1,843 times, 1 visits today)

Follow Me

Samuel Warde

Samuel is a writer, social activist, and all-around troublemaker.
Follow Me

Latest posts by Samuel Warde (see all)